Talk:1v1

A lot of this page is specific to UT2004 and should be separated.

And how about the links to custom maps? Should famous custom maps get their own pages and how can we judge, which custom maps should get a page and which not? --Fierce 17:37, 19 September 2007 (EDT)

For now we do not have any precedent for that, hence custom content/maps having their own pages should be avoided for the time being. --Sir Brizz 00:45, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

Perhaps a separate page should be created dedicated specifically to the most popular/praised community content--the "start here" as it were? I agree that custom content should not have its own page, but I think it would be a good idea to have a list of maps that frequently show up on servers and such, plus (maybe) the highest-rated maps ever like Aristocracy. --IceCreamYou 16:52, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

This article makes it sound like 1on1 is for training purposes only. As a matter of fact it stands as a separate gametype where cunning, tactics and "mind reading" skills are very important. And 1on1 is not the only name for this mode... i heard duel way more often. Glider of chaos 02:07, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

Gametype?
How on earth do people get here without being lucky by pressing the Random Article link or reading the Last Changes? It's not in gametypes, nor in any other categories. Plus, I really think it should be the official 1on1 as it's written on maps. And also, I'd say that the neutrality of this article is disputed - it only talks about online games, doesn't mention that 1on1-prefix maps are made for it, mentions unofficial mods/maps and gives server IPs. Needs at least a clenup tag. --GreatEmerald 12:03, 30 July 2008 (EDT)