NewsUnrealEdForumsFilesModsFragBU

Skin

BeyondUnreal


Personal tools

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ascension Rites"

From Liandri Archives

Jump to: navigation, search
 
(About the Liandri being new to the Rites)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Have a source on this being the first time Liandri has sponsored the ascension rites? --[[User:Sir Brizz|Sir Brizz]] 15:51, 13 August 2007 (EDT)
 
Have a source on this being the first time Liandri has sponsored the ascension rites? --[[User:Sir Brizz|Sir Brizz]] 15:51, 13 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: It is never explicitly stated, but strongly implied [http://www.gametrailers.com/player/4714.html here]. I'm going to start playing the game again sometime soon, hopefully, so perhaps I'll find more. Adding a "maybe" to the statement in the article would make it worse in my opinion, but removing it altogether isn't the right option either, as the Liandri are relatively new at least. Not sure there is a way to say that without making it sound stupid though. Hmmm, maybe just saying it like I just did, that UC2 cutscenes imply the Liandri are new this year or something like that. [[User:Retodon8|Retodon8]] 19:07, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:07, 13 August 2007

Have a source on this being the first time Liandri has sponsored the ascension rites? --Sir Brizz 15:51, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

It is never explicitly stated, but strongly implied here. I'm going to start playing the game again sometime soon, hopefully, so perhaps I'll find more. Adding a "maybe" to the statement in the article would make it worse in my opinion, but removing it altogether isn't the right option either, as the Liandri are relatively new at least. Not sure there is a way to say that without making it sound stupid though. Hmmm, maybe just saying it like I just did, that UC2 cutscenes imply the Liandri are new this year or something like that. Retodon8 19:07, 13 August 2007 (EDT)