Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flak Cannon"

From Liandri Archives

Jump to: navigation, search

Revision as of 16:48, 5 August 2007

UC, UT2003 and UT2004 sections are pointless if the guns are identical. They aren't, so "see below" isn't really valid input for that area. Also, saying in the Unreal section "it is a lot like the UT gun, see below" isn't really a good idea. We want people to be able to find most of the information they need in specific sections on the weapon pages, even at the cost of a little redundancy within a page. --Sir Brizz 23:15, 4 August 2007 (EDT)

Something I did killed the UT2004 flak weapon box. :( -- T2A` 18:46, 5 August 2007 (EDT)

Hmm. It apparently thought you were trying to make it do a mathematical equation in there. The box isn't great for long lines per descriptive amount so I have adopted something more like what I put here (just moved the more descriptive stuff to the explanation). --Sir Brizz 18:48, 5 August 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://liandri.beyondunreal.com/Talk:Flak_Cannon?oldid=4305"

Revision as of 16:46, 5 August 2007 (view source) T2A` (talk \| contribs) (.).) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:48, 5 August 2007 (view source) Sir Brizz (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Something I did killed the UT2004 flak weapon box. :( -- [[User:T2A`\|T2A`]] 18:46, 5 August 2007 (EDT)		Something I did killed the UT2004 flak weapon box. :( -- [[User:T2A`\|T2A`]] 18:46, 5 August 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	Hmm. It apparently thought you were trying to make it do a mathematical equation in there. The box isn't great for long lines per descriptive amount so I have adopted something more like what I put here (just moved the more descriptive stuff to the explanation). --[[User:Sir Brizz\|Sir Brizz]] 18:48, 5 August 2007 (EDT)