Difference between revisions of "Talk:Team ArenaMaster"

Latest revision as of 04:52, 4 January 2008

Can we eliminate some more of the bias here? I know this was largely copied from the FragBU wiki, but the standards are a bit different here. --Haarg 21:19, 3 January 2008 (EST)

What bias? I rewrote quite a bit. The rest is facts -- adren is key to TAM, TDM/CTF players hated it and only played it because that's where the majority was, it's the only "alive" gametype in UT2004 right now, etc. It is a fact that TAM is much less complex than other stock gametypes. That was the point of its creation. -- T2A` 23:52, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Do we really need a page for every popular bit of custom content here? I thought this was going to be kept to official stuff. Not to mention that the "reception" section is pretty much full of crap.Tahngarthor 00:05, 4 January 2008 (EST)

Not every bit of custom content, but something as popular as TAM is relevant. The reception section specifically is what I was referring to. It's fine to mention that many CTF/TDM players were upset over the success of TAM. The problem is that it is written with the assumption that they are 'better' gametypes. --Haarg 00:58, 4 January 2008 (EST)

I guess I must have been living in a cave or something, because I've never heard of TAM (outside of hearing the abbriviation tossed around a few times) and I played plenty of 2k4 online. I guess my work on JailBreak distracted me too much from the rest of the online scene. Tahngarthor 03:14, 4 January 2008 (EST)

Perhaps it would be good to have an "Unofficial content" template that puts a bit of text at the top, so readers can more easily see when something isn't official material? Maybe a category too? (I personally read "TAM" numerous times online, but had no idea what it was until now. Jailbreak's different, also because it appeared for a whole bunch of games.) I'm sure what custom content to add to the LA will remain a relatively controversial issue. Retodon8 06:52, 4 January 2008 (EST)