Difference between revisions of "Talk:Team ArenaMaster"

From Liandri Archives

Jump to: navigation, search

Revision as of 22:58, 3 January 2008

Can we eliminate some more of the bias here? I know this was largely copied from the FragBU wiki, but the standards are a bit different here. --Haarg 21:19, 3 January 2008 (EST)

What bias? I rewrote quite a bit. The rest is facts -- adren is key to TAM, TDM/CTF players hated it and only played it because that's where the majority was, it's the only "alive" gametype in UT2004 right now, etc. It is a fact that TAM is much less complex than other stock gametypes. That was the point of its creation. -- T2A` 23:52, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Do we really need a page for every popular bit of custom content here? I thought this was going to be kept to official stuff. Not to mention that the "reception" section is pretty much full of crap.Tahngarthor 00:05, 4 January 2008 (EST)

Not every bit of custom content, but something as popular as TAM is relevant. The reception section specifically is what I was referring to. It's fine to mention that many CTF/TDM players were upset over the success of TAM. The problem is that it is written with the assumption that they are 'better' gametypes. --Haarg 00:58, 4 January 2008 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://liandri.beyondunreal.com/Talk:Team_ArenaMaster?oldid=7174"

Revision as of 22:09, 3 January 2008 (view source) Tahngarthor (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:58, 3 January 2008 (view source) Haarg (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Do we really need a page for every popular bit of custom content here? I thought this was going to be kept to official stuff. Not to mention that the "reception" section is pretty much full of crap.[[User:Tahngarthor\|Tahngarthor]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (EST)		Do we really need a page for every popular bit of custom content here? I thought this was going to be kept to official stuff. Not to mention that the "reception" section is pretty much full of crap.[[User:Tahngarthor\|Tahngarthor]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	Not every bit of custom content, but something as popular as TAM is relevant. The reception section specifically is what I was referring to. It's fine to mention that many CTF/TDM players were upset over the success of TAM. The problem is that it is written with the assumption that they are 'better' gametypes. --[[User:Haarg\|Haarg]] 00:58, 4 January 2008 (EST)