Skin
Game Sections
- Unreal
- Unreal: RTNP
- Unreal II
- Unreal Tournament
- UT2003
- UT2004
- Unreal Tournament 3
- Unreal Championship
- Unreal Championship 2
Personal tools
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sniper Rifle"
From Liandri Archives
(→Mutators) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Mutators== | ==Mutators== | ||
Is it likely there will ever be a [[Lightning Guns (mutator)]] article? Rather, do we want an article like that? There's usually not much to say. I personally think it would be better to have a "UT mutators", "UT2004 mutators", and so on, with a complete list along with small descriptions. (Haarg just made links to not currently existing articles like that, which is why I'm asking.) [[User:Retodon8|Retodon8]] 13:18, 3 February 2008 (EST) | Is it likely there will ever be a [[Lightning Guns (mutator)]] article? Rather, do we want an article like that? There's usually not much to say. I personally think it would be better to have a "UT mutators", "UT2004 mutators", and so on, with a complete list along with small descriptions. (Haarg just made links to not currently existing articles like that, which is why I'm asking.) [[User:Retodon8|Retodon8]] 13:18, 3 February 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | For those mutators, I doubt we would ever have individual pages. They could still most likely exist as redirect pages. In fact, the only mutator that would likely deserve its own page would be InstaGib. A page that describes what a mutator is would probably be good as well; that might work as a category page. --[[User:Haarg|Haarg]] 06:07, 4 February 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 04:07, 4 February 2008
Combining UT2003 and UC in this instance is probably acceptable, unless someone can give a reason why it is not. --Sir Brizz 10:22, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
Red Riding Hood
Why? Because I can. :p Also because it was the first thing that came to my mind when I thought of the visibility of the tracer for some reason. --Dark Pulse 14:19, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
Mutators
Is it likely there will ever be a Lightning Guns (mutator) article? Rather, do we want an article like that? There's usually not much to say. I personally think it would be better to have a "UT mutators", "UT2004 mutators", and so on, with a complete list along with small descriptions. (Haarg just made links to not currently existing articles like that, which is why I'm asking.) Retodon8 13:18, 3 February 2008 (EST)
For those mutators, I doubt we would ever have individual pages. They could still most likely exist as redirect pages. In fact, the only mutator that would likely deserve its own page would be InstaGib. A page that describes what a mutator is would probably be good as well; that might work as a category page. --Haarg 06:07, 4 February 2008 (EST)