Difference between revisions of "Talk:XMP vehicles"

From Liandri Archives

Jump to: navigation, search

Revision as of 08:26, 14 August 2007

Should we have the XMP vehicles all on the same page? UT2004/UT3 vehicles are being separated out, but those will generally have more content than there will be for these. --Haarg 04:50, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

As you said, the amount of content is one reason why I chose to do one big article. Maybe if somebody (multiple bodies) adds info about the different vehicles, they will be more deserving of their own articles, but I don't expect this to happen. I think it's a crying shame, but XMP never got of the ground properly, and it's dead for most intents and purposes. :( This also means vehicles probably won't be returning like the UT ones, which helped those in the article content department. Well, maybe due to UTXMP someone will add a bunch of tactics and the like, stretching he article enough to split it up. Speaking of which-like, there should be some embedded vehicles images in the article. :) Retodon8 10:26, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://liandri.beyondunreal.com/Talk:XMP_vehicles?oldid=4858"

Revision as of 02:50, 14 August 2007 (view source) Haarg (talk \| contribs)		Revision as of 08:26, 14 August 2007 (view source) Retodon8 (talk \| contribs) (Response to all vehicles in one article) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should we have the XMP vehicles all on the same page? UT2004/UT3 vehicles are being separated out, but those will generally have more content than there will be for these. --[[User:Haarg\|Haarg]] 04:50, 14 August 2007 (EDT)		Should we have the XMP vehicles all on the same page? UT2004/UT3 vehicles are being separated out, but those will generally have more content than there will be for these. --[[User:Haarg\|Haarg]] 04:50, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	: As you said, the amount of content is one reason why I chose to do one big article. Maybe if somebody (multiple bodies) adds info about the different vehicles, they will be more deserving of their own articles, but I don't expect this to happen. I think it's a crying shame, but XMP never got of the ground properly, and it's dead for most intents and purposes. :( This also means vehicles probably won't be returning like the UT ones, which helped those in the article content department. Well, maybe due to UTXMP someone will add a bunch of tactics and the like, stretching he article enough to split it up. Speaking of which-like, there should be some embedded vehicles images in the article. :) [[User:Retodon8\|Retodon8]] 10:26, 14 August 2007 (EDT)