Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Vehicles"

Latest revision as of 21:53, 1 January 2008

Splitting the category

Shouldn't we create sub-categories for necris/axon vehicles? Also maybe one for UT3 and UT04. --Awaw 09:50, 1 January 2008 (EST)

There aren't that many different vehicles, so would that really make things easier (to find)? Splitting Necris and Axon is basically the same as splitting UT2 and UT3. Well, minus some exceptions: The Ion Plasma Tank, which is actually Izanagi's work. The XMP vehicles, made by... who? The space fighters, of which the Black Scorpion is Skaarj-made, don't know about the Eagle. The Phoenix bomber, probably also Axon... can't think of more. After this list I think categorizing by manufacturer at least will make things too complicated, so maybe just per game. Retodon8 11:49, 1 January 2008 (EST)

It may not be useful to have separate gametypes, but it could make sense to have a vehicle navbox similar to Template:Multiplayer Gametypes which would separate by manufacturer. --Haarg 23:53, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Removing the Hoverboard

I personally don't see the Hoverboard as a vehicle, what are your thoughts? --Awaw 09:50, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Well, it acts like a vehicle in many ways, for example by attracting scorpion shots or being disabled by EMP mines. The only difference is, that you select it like a weapon, which is why it's in both categories. (Shouldn't discussion this belong on Talk:Hoverboard?) --Wormbo 10:44, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Its ambiguous nature probably best places it in both categories then, I agree. Retodon8 11:49, 1 January 2008 (EST)