Difference between revisions of "Talk:CTF-1on1-Joust"

From Liandri Archives

Jump to: navigation, search

Revision as of 18:19, 1 February 2008

Right, this one uses a slightly different setup than the DM stubs, but that's because I put some thought into it this time. I really missed a map description in the stubs. I'll add it to the DM maps after I make the stubs for the other gametypes.
Apart from a "See Also" subsection at the bottom (where needed) I think that this pretty much covers it. The few articles that were already made all used a different set (and order) of subsections, so I'd like to agree on 1 setup that we can use for all of the maps (well, except AS and ONS) --Kaithofis 18:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)

The main thing I still want to improve is the weapon/pickup listings. They end up being long and disorganized, and often there is information taking up a lot of room that isn't very valuable (ammo counts for example). See Talk:DM-Deck17 for a couple ideas for alternate setups. --Haarg 19:19, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://liandri.beyondunreal.com/Talk:CTF-1on1-Joust?oldid=7719"

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 I really missed a map description in the stubs. I'll add it to the DM maps after I make the stubs for the other gametypes. <br>
 Apart from a "See Also" subsection at the bottom (where needed) I think that this pretty much covers it. The few articles that were already made all used a different set (and order) of subsections, so I'd like to agree on 1 setup that we can use for all of the maps (well, except AS and ONS) --[[User:Kaithofis|Kaithofis]] 18:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)
+The main thing I still want to improve is the weapon/pickup listings.  They end up being long and disorganized, and often there is information taking up a lot of room that isn't very valuable (ammo counts for example).  See [[Talk:DM-Deck17]] for a couple ideas for alternate setups. --[[User:Haarg|Haarg]] 19:19, 1 February 2008 (EST)