Talk:RA-Inoxx

Remove, this is only semi-official and should be merged with Rocket Arena: UT. Although this question is open. --GreatEmerald 07:50, 17 October 2008 (EDT)

Here's a suggestion: How about making 1 page for all RA maps? The RA page would feature a shortlist with a link to the main article of the maps. That article would feature the maps' infoboxes with screenshots and a short description. I'm suggesting this because I'm not keen on doing map pages on every single map from every single mod (which no-one will be doing, so why even try), but it would be nice to have at least some information. --Kaithofis 11:43, 17 October 2008 (EDT)

Yeap, that's what I mean, semi-official mods shouldn't have their own map pages. And I  Support your map list idea. --GreatEmerald 12:30, 17 October 2008 (EDT)

 Support UTGOTY and UT2004ECE combined have far too much custom content to have map pages for everything. One page for the mod and one of the map list sounds good to me. — Haarg 15:32, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Right, that's 3 in favor. I don't think there are enough active members to form a large enough opposition. I'm in doubt on what the pagenames should be. "Rocket Arena: UT" makes sense, but "Rocket Arena: UT: Maps" looks kinda silly. For the sake of unification and trying to avoid silly names I suggest that we go with "Rocket Arena" and "Rocket Arena: Maps" instead. We could open the RA article by summarizing the scope and versions of the mod, but that we will limit ourselves to the UT version. --Kaithofis 19:47, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

 Oppose, because we DO want to limit ourselves to the UT version. All other versions are for Quake! And maps could be called Rocket Arena maps, as even though the mod is called Rocket Arena: UT, the gametype (RA) is plainly Rocket Arena. --GreatEmerald 09:08, 22 October 2008 (EDT)