Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ripper"

Revision as of 08:46, 28 August 2007

CUTTER inclusion

I've reverted that part about the CUTTER; while it is correct, the focus is on stock weaponry in the games, and not addon weapons, I think. Though I think eventually we'll cover more of the popular mods (Of which CUT is no doubt one of them) it'd probably simply be better to do it on a seperate page for the mod, rather than in the main articles themselves, as not everybody will download that mod. --Dark Pulse 23:14, 21 August 2007 (EDT)

I agree. --Sir Brizz 18:42, 22 August 2007 (EDT)

As do I by the way. It would be impossible to properly/fairly judge which mods should/shouldn't be added, not to mention the already mentioned fact that it only adds noise to the article... minus for those that happened to know the mod. Retodon8 06:48, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

The only reason I thought I should give mention to the CUTTER from CUTII was because the mod was packaged with a later version *The ECE Version* of UT2004. It felt to me like it was a legitimate reason but I will hold back from mod influence and keep to stock weapon influence. --Miko101 10:15, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

I woulnd't be too cut up about it. I think it's probably worthwhile to have a link to a Chaos UT page on the wiki somewhere, but the things included in the mod should be mentioned there, not here. --Sir Brizz 11:46, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

Category page name

The reason I had that {{PAGENAME}} in there was because there was a space preceding it. With the weapon categories, the lists are short enough that the large letter headings look kind of silly. The extra space means everything is sorted at the top without a letter heading. There may be a better way to do that, or to format the letters. I'm open to suggestions. This is yet another thing that will be easier to deal with if/when we can upgrade MediaWiki --Haarg 10:37, 22 August 2007 (EDT)

Actually I thought that was a bug with the wiki software somehow; I was missing the alphabet headers. With short lists I suppose that feature does lose some of its usefulness. Retodon8 11:01, 22 August 2007 (EDT)